The author argues that we should not see AI as a threat that takes human jobs, but rather as a partner that augments human capabilities. The author concludes that the 'ability to ask questions (problem-setting ability),' which AI cannot do, is the value that will be required of humans in the future. Answer choice 1 accurately summarizes the core of this argument. Choice 2 mentions social policy, which is not the main point of the text. Choice 3 points out AI's limitations, but this is only part of the premise of the argument, not the main point. Choice 4 is incorrect because it only emphasizes the pessimistic aspect, which is different from the author's intention in citing history (that technology has aspects of both replacement and augmentation).