What is the difference between "要証事実" and "争点効"?

"要証事実" represents "fact in issue / fact requiring proof" (Level: C2), while "争点効" represents "issue preclusion / collateral estoppel" (Level: C2). They belong to the synonym comparative set.

synonym Comparative

要証事実

争点効

Differences Between "要証事実" and "争点効"

Option A

要証事実

Meaning

fact in issue / fact requiring proof

Reading

ようしょうじじつ (youshoujijitsu)

Syllabus Level

Practical Example

私は要証事実に興味があります。

I am interested in fact in issue / fact requiring proof.

Option B

争点効

Meaning

issue preclusion / collateral estoppel

Reading

そうてんこう (soutenkou)

Syllabus Level

Practical Example

私は争点効に興味があります。

I am interested in issue preclusion / collateral estoppel.

Which one to use?

Select the correct Japanese word for this context

Which word fits this context: "(fact in issue / fact requiring proof)"?

🎉 正解 / Correct!

使い分け解説:
- 要証事実: Essential structural term in CEFR C2 vocabulary syllabus. (CEFR C2語彙シラバスにおける重要表現です。)
- 争点効: Essential structural term in CEFR C2 vocabulary syllabus. (CEFR C2語彙シラバスにおける重要表現です。)

🦅

Want to boost your Japanese vocabulary?

Project Eagle automatically tracks and targets your weak words using AI. Practice thousands of operational exams completely for free!