Synonym Nuance VS
How to say "Be" in Japanese
Both words can translate to "be", but which should you choose?
Japanese Option A
足りる
たりる (tariru)
N4 / CEFR Syllabus
VS
Japanese Option B
関わる
かかわる (kakawaru)
N3 / CEFR Syllabus
Nuance Contrast & Translation Difference
When translating "be" into Japanese, you must choose carefully between 足りる and 関わる.
In Japanese, 足りる (たりる (tariru)) is typically associated with "to be enough; to be sufficient" (Syllabus Level: N4) and represents Intransitive verb. Indicates that a quantity, amount, or ability is adequate for a specific purpose. 必要な量や能力が十分にあることを示します。.
On the other hand, 関わる (かかわる (kakawaru)) maps to "to be involved in; to have to do with; to be concerned with" (Syllabus Level: N3) and represents Often used to describe involvement in an event, problem, or relationship. It can sometimes carry a negative connotation if referring to troublesome involvement.. A literal translation of "be" can often sound unnatural to native Japanese speakers if mixed up!
Bilingual Context for "足りる"
時間がないから、これで足りるでしょう。
There's no time, so this should be enough.
Bilingual Context for "関わる"
彼はそのプロジェクトに深く関わっている。
He is deeply involved in that project.
Nuance Mastery Quiz
Which Japanese word perfectly fits this blank space?
Fill in the blank: "時間がないから、これで ＿＿＿ でしょう。" (Meaning: "There's no time, so this should be enough.")
🎉 Correct Answer!
Remember: "足りる" fits here because it means "to be enough; to be sufficient" in the context of: "There's no time, so this should be enough.". "関わる" represents "to be involved in; to have to do with; to be concerned with".