Synonym Nuance VS
How to say "Be" in Japanese
Both words can translate to "be", but which should you choose?
Japanese Option A
足りる
たりる (tariru)
N4 / CEFR Syllabus
VS
Japanese Option B
担当する
たんとうする (tantō suru)
N3 / CEFR Syllabus
Nuance Contrast & Translation Difference
When translating "be" into Japanese, you must choose carefully between 足りる and 担当する.
In Japanese, 足りる (たりる (tariru)) is typically associated with "to be enough; to be sufficient" (Syllabus Level: N4) and represents Intransitive verb. Indicates that a quantity, amount, or ability is adequate for a specific purpose. 必要な量や能力が十分にあることを示します。.
On the other hand, 担当する (たんとうする (tantō suru)) maps to "to be in charge of; to take responsibility for; to be responsible for" (Syllabus Level: N3) and represents Often used in business or formal settings to indicate being responsible for a specific role, task, or department. It implies taking on a duty or charge.. A literal translation of "be" can often sound unnatural to native Japanese speakers if mixed up!
Bilingual Context for "足りる"
時間がないから、これで足りるでしょう。
There's no time, so this should be enough.
Bilingual Context for "担当する"
私はこのプロジェクトの管理を担当しています。
I am in charge of managing this project.
Nuance Mastery Quiz
Which Japanese word perfectly fits this blank space?
Fill in the blank: "時間がないから、これで ＿＿＿ でしょう。" (Meaning: "There's no time, so this should be enough.")
🎉 Correct Answer!
Remember: "足りる" fits here because it means "to be enough; to be sufficient" in the context of: "There's no time, so this should be enough.". "担当する" represents "to be in charge of; to take responsibility for; to be responsible for".