Synonym Nuance VS
How to say "Be" in Japanese
Both words can translate to "be", but which should you choose?
Japanese Option A
出来る
できる (dekiru)
N4 / CEFR Syllabus
VS
Japanese Option B
欠ける
かける (kakeru)
N3 / CEFR Syllabus
Nuance Contrast & Translation Difference
When translating "be" into Japanese, you must choose carefully between 出来る and 欠ける.
In Japanese, 出来る (できる (dekiru)) is typically associated with "to be able to; can; to be made; to be completed" (Syllabus Level: N4) and represents This versatile verb expresses ability.
On the other hand, 欠ける (かける (kakeru)) maps to "to be chipped, to be broken, to lack, to be missing" (Syllabus Level: N3) and represents Intransitive verb. Indicates that a part of something is gone, missing, or that something is incomplete.. A literal translation of "be" can often sound unnatural to native Japanese speakers if mixed up!
Bilingual Context for "出来る"
私は日本語ができます。
I can speak Japanese.
Bilingual Context for "欠ける"
このコップは縁が少し欠けている。
The rim of this glass is slightly chipped.
Nuance Mastery Quiz
Which Japanese word perfectly fits this blank space?
Fill in the blank: "私は日本語ができます。" (Meaning: "I can speak Japanese.")
🎉 Correct Answer!
Remember: "出来る" fits here because it means "to be able to; can; to be made; to be completed" in the context of: "I can speak Japanese.". "欠ける" represents "to be chipped, to be broken, to lack, to be missing".