Synonym Nuance VS
How to say "Be" in Japanese
Both words can translate to "be", but which should you choose?
Japanese Option A
できる
できる (dekiru)
N4 / CEFR Syllabus
VS
Japanese Option B
欠ける
かける (kakeru)
N3 / CEFR Syllabus
Nuance Contrast & Translation Difference
When translating "be" into Japanese, you must choose carefully between できる and 欠ける.
In Japanese, できる (できる (dekiru)) is typically associated with "to be able to, to be completed, to be made, to be built (intransitive)" (Syllabus Level: N4) and represents An intransitive verb with multiple meanings: 'to be able to.
On the other hand, 欠ける (かける (kakeru)) maps to "to be chipped, to be broken, to lack, to be missing" (Syllabus Level: N3) and represents Intransitive verb. Indicates that a part of something is gone, missing, or that something is incomplete.. A literal translation of "be" can often sound unnatural to native Japanese speakers if mixed up!
Bilingual Context for "できる"
この家は来月にはできるでしょう。
This house will probably be completed by next month.
Bilingual Context for "欠ける"
このコップは縁が少し欠けている。
The rim of this glass is slightly chipped.
Nuance Mastery Quiz
Which Japanese word perfectly fits this blank space?
Fill in the blank: "この家は来月には ＿＿＿ でしょう。" (Meaning: "This house will probably be completed by next month.")
🎉 Correct Answer!
Remember: "できる" fits here because it means "to be able to, to be completed, to be made, to be built (intransitive)" in the context of: "This house will probably be completed by next month.". "欠ける" represents "to be chipped, to be broken, to lack, to be missing".