Synonym Nuance VS
How to say "Be" in Japanese
Both words can translate to "be", but which should you choose?
Japanese Option A
がっかりする
がっかりする (gakkari suru)
N4 / CEFR Syllabus
VS
Japanese Option B
足りる
たりる (tariru)
N4 / CEFR Syllabus
Nuance Contrast & Translation Difference
When translating "be" into Japanese, you must choose carefully between がっかりする and 足りる.
In Japanese, がっかりする (がっかりする (gakkari suru)) is typically associated with "to be disappointed, to feel let down" (Syllabus Level: N4) and represents An onomatopoeic verb describing the feeling of disappointment or sadness when expectations are not met. Often used with a particle like に.
On the other hand, 足りる (たりる (tariru)) maps to "to be enough; to be sufficient" (Syllabus Level: N4) and represents Intransitive verb. Indicates that a quantity, amount, or ability is adequate for a specific purpose. 必要な量や能力が十分にあることを示します。. A literal translation of "be" can often sound unnatural to native Japanese speakers if mixed up!
Bilingual Context for "がっかりする"
試合に負けてがっかりした。
I was disappointed because we lost the game.
Bilingual Context for "足りる"
時間がないから、これで足りるでしょう。
There's no time, so this should be enough.
Nuance Mastery Quiz
Which Japanese word perfectly fits this blank space?
Fill in the blank: "試合に負けてがっかりした。" (Meaning: "I was disappointed because we lost the game.")
🎉 Correct Answer!
Remember: "がっかりする" fits here because it means "to be disappointed, to feel let down" in the context of: "I was disappointed because we lost the game.". "足りる" represents "to be enough; to be sufficient".