Synonym Nuance VS
How to say "Be" in Japanese
Both words can translate to "be", but which should you choose?
Japanese Option A
がっかりする
がっかりする (gakkari suru)
N4 / CEFR Syllabus
VS
Japanese Option B
基づく
もとづく (motozuku)
N3 / CEFR Syllabus
Nuance Contrast & Translation Difference
When translating "be" into Japanese, you must choose carefully between がっかりする and 基づく.
In Japanese, がっかりする (がっかりする (gakkari suru)) is typically associated with "to be disappointed, to feel let down" (Syllabus Level: N4) and represents An onomatopoeic verb describing the feeling of disappointment or sadness when expectations are not met. Often used with a particle like に.
On the other hand, 基づく (もとづく (motozuku)) maps to "to be based on, to be founded on" (Syllabus Level: N3) and represents ある事実や規則、理念などを「根拠とする」ことを意味します。通常、「～に基づいて」の形で使われます。/ Means to 'be based on' facts, rules, or principles. Usually used in the form "～に基づいて. A literal translation of "be" can often sound unnatural to native Japanese speakers if mixed up!
Bilingual Context for "がっかりする"
試合に負けてがっかりした。
I was disappointed because we lost the game.
Bilingual Context for "基づく"
この計画は、最新のデータに基づいて作成されました。
This plan was created based on the latest data.
Nuance Mastery Quiz
Which Japanese word perfectly fits this blank space?
Fill in the blank: "試合に負けてがっかりした。" (Meaning: "I was disappointed because we lost the game.")
🎉 Correct Answer!
Remember: "がっかりする" fits here because it means "to be disappointed, to feel let down" in the context of: "I was disappointed because we lost the game.". "基づく" represents "to be based on, to be founded on".